Riker's profile: (percentages * 100)

	 959: Lincoln > Douglas > Bell > Breckinridge
	3020: Lincoln > Bell > Douglas > Breckinridge
	 179: Douglas > Lincoln > Breckinridge > Bell
	 676: Douglas > Lincoln > Bell > Breckinridge
	 367: Douglas > Breckinridge > Lincoln > Bell
	1037: Douglas > Breckinridge > Bell > Lincoln
	 679: Douglas > Bell > Lincoln > Breckinridge
	 224: Breckinridge > Douglas > Lincoln > Bell
	 708: Breckinridge > Douglas > Bell > Lincoln
	 888: Breckinridge > Bell > Lincoln > Douglas
	 577: Bell > Lincoln > Douglas > Breckinridge
	 244: Bell > Douglas > Lincoln > Breckinridge
	  60: Bell > Douglas > Breckinridge > Lincoln
	  66: Bell > Breckinridge > Lincoln > Douglas
	 312: Bell > Breckinridge > Douglas > Lincoln

	 Condorcet rank: Lincoln > Bell > Douglas > Breckinridge

Mean Historian Profile (percentages * 100):
	
	2117: Lincoln > Douglas > Bell > Breckinridge
	1861: Lincoln > Bell > Douglas > Breckinridge
	  11: Douglas > Lincoln > Breckinridge > Bell
	 804: Douglas > Lincoln > Bell > Breckinridge
	  22: Douglas > Breckinridge > Lincoln > Bell
	 487: Douglas > Breckinridge > Bell > Lincoln
	 859: Douglas > Bell > Lincoln > Breckinridge
	 753: Douglas > Bell > Breckinridge > Lincoln
	1300: Breckinridge > Douglas > Lincoln > Bell
	 687: Breckinridge > Douglas > Bell > Lincoln
	1119: Breckinridge > Bell > Lincoln > Douglas
	 170: Bell > Lincoln > Douglas > Breckinridge
	 448: Bell > Douglas > Lincoln > Breckinridge
	 381: Bell > Douglas > Breckinridge > Lincoln
	   4: Bell > Breckinridge > Lincoln > Douglas
	 256: Bell > Breckinridge > Douglas > Lincoln

	 Condorcet rank: Douglas > Lincoln > Bell > Breckinridge

	 For 		Against ->
	  v
	  		Bell	Breckinridge	Douglas	Lincoln
	 Bell		####	7653		4239	5164
	 Breckinridge	3626	############	3366	5009
	 Douglas	7040	7913		#######	6008
	 Lincoln	6115	6270		5271	######

References:

Tabarrok, A. and L. Spector. 1999.  Would the Borda Count have Avoided the 
Civil War? Journal of Theoretical Politics 11(2): 261-288.